I had an "Anniversary Thought" the other day.
When we remember "family victims"... should we include Bernard Crowe?
OK... I know he was dealing in drugs... I know he was holding a girl hostage... I know he called the ranch... asked for "Charles"... and made threats/demands... AND, I know, he survived the shooting.
Crowe was no saint, and clearly placed himself in danger, by his own hand. One might even say, Manson shot Crowe in self defense...
BUT... consider this:
Manson blew the man's guts apart from point-blank range. And, didn't Crowe leave the bullet in his back forever... for fear that removing it, would be worse healthwise? Wasn't the bullet lodged, dangerously close to his spine? And, didn't Crowe also die fairly young?
I submit, that Manson's blasting his chest apart, and lodging a bullet in the man's back forever (I'm pretty sure that was the outcome)... likely took years off Crowe's life. So... in a sense... at some level... wasn't Crowe a victim (of the whole mixed-up family), as well?
Any takers? LOL It just strikes me, that Crowe never gets an ounce of sympathy.
Any love for Bernie?? Just stuff I think about...
===================================================================
Big Patty...