Man who says he's Charles Manson's grandson won't voluntarily submit to DNA test
LA Times: https://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-manson-grandson-dna-20181214-story.html
I have no dog in this race, and I have absolutely no interest in participating in this drama.
But having said that, I will make one simple observation:
If Freeman has absolutely no doubts regarding his biological ties to Manson, then why wouldn't he be eager to put this matter to rest (with a simple DNA test)?
A DNA sample takes one second to collect.
They swab the inside of your mouth with a Q-Tip, and you're done.
By refusing to take a DNA test, Freeman diminishes his credibility.
"“There are people on the other side who are trying to build up a case against me".
But, Freeman could defeat ALL of his challengers and detractors with one simple test.
There would be no viable case against him whatsoever, if he passed a DNA test.
The fact that he refuses to take the test, makes absolutely no sense to me.
If he really IS Manson's grandson, then a positive DNA test would clearly benefit him the MOST.
Am I missing something here, or is this Freeman guy kinda strange?