Even by 60s standards im not seeing what the big deal is, she looks lije a little raccoon, eyes close together, little tiny nose, looks part Asian as well, i wouldnt even rank her in the top 10 of "family" girls and that aint saying much
Welll, SAG, aren't you just a little treasure. "Even by 60's standards" (whatever that means) and "a little raccoon, eyes close together, little tiny nose" and the always charming "looks part Asian." WTF? Good Lord. Don't answer please. No idea when these photos were taken, but am guessing the middle photo is after Manson and crew...she looks sad and a little apprehensive there. But she is darling in the bottom photo. Happy, pretty, with a beautiful smile on her pretty face. And she is a pretty woman now...at sixty something.
I guess you and i have a different idea of what pretty is, i wouldnt even throw her my table scraps
SAG,It must be nice to be the standard on which attractiveness is measured. We all have different standards of what is beautiful to us, but I pity the person who attacks others base on looks, for they are a shallow and spiritually poor person on the inside, missing out on so much in life.
SAG I didn't allow your last comment. It was ugly and hateful, or more ugly and hateful than usual.I think Dianne was a pretty girl. A girl who didn't deserve all the crap she endured. I'll be posting my book review probably tomorrow.
As ugly and hateful as the comments you make about the men in the family who you find unattractive? Funny the double standard when its a man talking about a womans physical attractiveness
SAG why don't you post a picture of yourself and we'll all critique your looks.
I think she was a very pretty girl.But hey, to each his own...
SAG said:"I guess you and i have a different idea of what pretty is, i wouldnt even throw her my table scraps."With all due respect, what makes you think that Dianne Lake would want you... or your scraps... (then or now)?I mean, c'mon Bro, let's be honest, when's the last time you dated a girl more attractive than Dianne Lake in her prime?Based on the frequency with which you post here (and elsewhere), and your "UnaBomber" personality, it's really hard to imagine you're getting laid at all.You'd have to be Brad Pitt, for any woman to get past your "anti-everything" personality alone.I'm not trying to be an asshole, but let's get real.
This is borderline comical at this point...
SAG:This is all an act, right?I mean... you're not really this far-out are you?Jeezus...
Sometimes I think that SAG just gets a little grumpier as the night wears on.Oh well, night y'all.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mo_DMGc2v5o
Lol youre assuming im the same in my real life interactions as i am on here, this is nothing more than an escape for me, i love talking about the case, its really funny how much hypocrisy there is with women when it comes to talking about physical attractiveness, women can talk about a mans looks any way they want but when a man simply says a woman isnt his cup of tea its a huge problem lol, it shows women have absolutely nothing offer other than their sexuality and if they dont have that they turn to anger and bitterness lol
You sound very insecure about your looks, whats the probelm? Fat? Bad skin? Old? Lets be open about it lol
BTW why wasnt my comment about Beauders picture on the TLB board allowed?
A 65 year old woman has no right to be picky about anyone, theyre not relevant anymore, if they want someone theyll need to take what they get
Why dont you "girls" just add a statement at the beginning of threads with pictures of women ONLY POSITIVE COMMENTS WILL BE ACCEPTED, ALL OTHERS WILL BE DELETED?
This is like blogging with Harry Dunne."According to the map, we've only gone 4 inches".LMAO!
SAG said:"when a man simply says a woman isnt his cup of tea its a huge problem".Believe me, if you simply stated "she's not my cup of tea", no one would have batted an eyelash.You wrote a detailed critique of her face, and then, you said--- "I wouldn't throw her my table scraps".C'mon man... that's a little over the top.Even by YOUR most discerning standards (LOL), she's not THAT bad looking.Fuck me.I've seen girls WAY worse looking than Dianne Lake.For cripes sakes... do a "Google search" of "ugly bitches".Better yet... take a walk into ANY Walmart tonight! LMAO!Are we even looking at the same photos?If she's not your type... okay.But dude...You can't tell me with a straight face, that she's an ugly girl in those pictures...
Lol you know im right
Seriously, this guy should be a comedian."Dark Humor"... LOL
I didnt say she was ugly i said but shes very average and nowhere near good looking enough to be picky and choosy about anyone elses looks, shes nothing id look at twice on the street and id say thats probably true for most men
As gross as she was Susan Atkins was far better looking, Sandy was better looking, Cathy Gillies was better looking, Squeeky was better looking, Nancy Pitman was better looking, Sherry Cooper was better looking, Ruth Moorehouse was better looking, Ella Bailey was better looking, Cathy Share was better looking and im probably leaving a few out
Hi guys,I usually just lurk here, but, have to chime in to say these pictures have cleared up something that had puzzled me. Most of the photos I've seen of Dianne weren't very flattering, and I couldn't understand why Little Paul seemed so taken by her. These are very good photos and she's cute as a button!Whut
Hi Orwhut! Good to see you!!
Hi Orwhut.I'm glad you enjoyed the photos.I agree.I think she's a very cute girl.She's got those feminine squinty eyes like LeeAnn Rimes and Renee Zellweger, but she's also got the thick auburn hair and blue eyes.It's quite a combo.I don't even think the black and white photos do her justice, because her "coloring" (the blue eyes and auburn hair), are what make her most striking (as in, the last photo).Rock-on Brother!Feel free to visit anytime...
What did you say about me SAG?
Post a Comment