She was the victim of anal rape?It's a good thing that Debra never hooked up with that wild beast.I've lost a great deal of personal respect for Jack Nicholson after this.I'll never watch another Lakers game again so help me.
Hi Jim.Being a Celtics fan... I can't stand the Lakers anyway. Although... they do usually have a good team... I've gotta give them that much.I always hate the "star-studded" crowd when we play there.Every time the Celtics go to LA... it feels like we're playing against "Hollywood" .In a sense... I guess we are...
If Roman Polanski liked to sneak in from behind, can you just imagine what kind of fun Voyteck Frykowski must have enjoyed when he entertained his ladies?Some people might not find those kind of activities amusing and it could very well lead to certain people being severely dealt with and perhaps strung up with rope.I wonder what kind of position Salindar Nader enjoyed when entertained back at his pad?If i had to guess, he was probably a front door kind of guy.Sighs ..... Oh, the lifestyles of these hollywood jet setters. Sex, Drugs and The Beach Boys.What else could a surfer girl ask for?
Well... one thing's for sure.Polanski's behavior proves... these hollywood types, were not above reproach.I wouldn't put anything past anyone, at that time and place in history.Polanski and Wilson were both hollywood "big-wigs"... and both were up to their eyeballs in questionable behavior... so, who's to say...Some Bums are rich... and some Bums are poor... but, a Bum is a Bum... no matter how you slice it.One just dresses a little better than the other.
Well, according to Dr. Ruth, as long as people are in the privacy of their own homes and everyone consents, anything goes with sex. But.....who would want to have sex with her? HA HA.I wonder if Nicholson knew what Polanski was up to BEFORE the Geimer story broke. Were they doing a "tag team" at his house?Roman couldn't shell out a few bucks for a "rent by the hour motel"? He had to crash Jack's pad? Loser.It's not hard to imagine that Roman had to ply women with liquor then take them unwillingly. I mean...who'd have anything to do with that ugly little monster?
Wonder if this is the same house:Seasoned actor Jack Nicholson’s Los Angeles home reportedly went up in flames this past weekend on Friday night. Located on Woodrow Wilson drive, Nicholson’s two-story residence was quiet a scene with an estimated eighty-five firefighters battling the blaze at around 7:55pm, Matt Spence of the Los Angeles Fire Department informed the media.It says he's owned it since the early 70's..That house has bad Karma...
Hi Kimchi!!!!We did some research on this topic.Nicholson owns about 12 houses... and it's not the same address.According to Katie:"12850 Mullholland Drive, Los Angeles, CA is the home that Jack owns that Polanski molested the young girl (and also is the same house where he supposedly molested another girl a couple of years before that.)7327 Woodrow Wilson Drive, Los Angeles, CA is the home that Jack owns that burned".According to Starship... here's a complete list of Nicholson's propertys:http://www.bergproperties.com/blog/jack-nicholsons-many-properties-around-the-country-a-round-up-as-promised/
i don't get it why any woman especially sharon tate would want to be with polanski. he must very charming and charasmatic. michelle phillips though wrote he wasn't good in bed.
>>>Beauders said: i don't get it why any woman especially sharon tate would want to be with polanski. he must very charming and charasmatic. michelle phillips though wrote he wasn't good in bed.>>>Beauders I can't imagine anybody wanting to be with him either. I guess it has to do with money. He doesn't have any charm or charisma that I can detect in any of the videos I've seen of him. He doesn't even speak good English so it's hard to even understand him.Not only is he NOT good looking, charming or charismatic, he's not even a nice person.I guess it's the same as a young girl hooking up with an old man. If he didn't have a dime, she wouldn't give him a second look.
beauders said...>>>>>>he must very charming and charasmatic. michelle phillips though wrote he wasn't good in bed.<<<<<And she would know, right? LOL!I'm surprised she can keep straight who's who...
Hippie Scholar said...>>>>>She was the victim of anal rape?It's a good thing that Debra never hooked up with that wild beast.I've lost a great deal of personal respect for Jack Nicholson after this.I'll never watch another Lakers game again so help me.<<<<<<It's not Jack Nicholson's fault Roman Polanski is a creep. As the title indicates, this woman's rape is 'alleged'...was this article from 2010 the first time she revealed this information? If so, i find it interesting that she waited 36 years to come forth, 33 years after Roman Polanski committed a sex crime with a 13 year old child.That being said, I can't hold Jack Nicholson responsible for the criminal acts Roman Polanski may or may not have committed in 1974 and did commit in 1977 in his home without his knowledge and while he was not present.
Marliese that's a good point. Why did this woman wait so long to say anything? It's too late to do anything about it now.I'm assuming that Nicholson was aware of the fact that Polanksi was bringing girls to his house. I can't imagine why he would even let that happen.When Polanski molested Geimer, Angelica Huston was there that day when they got there (Jack was dating her then) and she later left the two alone, after which Polanski started his "moves". I would assume that Angelica would mention to Jack that Roman was even there.As vile as Roman is, he's not the only one to blame in this case. Samantha's mother should NEVER have let her daughter go off alone with an old man like Polanksi. She wanted her daughter to hit the big time paydirt and just went along with all this.What kind of busy movie producer has time to come pick her up at home? This all should have been done in a photographer's studio, and the mother should have gone along each time. I know I would have.
Hi Katie,The only point i meant to address, and you know...i started to talk about Anjelica Huston and erased it ...didn't want to go there, deciding instead to just answer the point being made about Nicholson...anyway, it's my understanding she actually lived there with Nicholson, was out and came home while Polanski and Samantha were there and asked the 'little freak' what's going on here?? Really, it had to be clear as day what was going on there...Anyway, my point was only meant to address the comment about the loss of respect for Nicholson and the irrelevancy of 'i'll never watch another Lakers game so help me'...but to each his own, Hippie Scholar can feel however he cares to feel about Jack Nicholson.I think if Jack Nicholson shared in the responsibility, he would have been sued in civil court or named in the civil suit...a lawyer would have been all over that...Personally though, obviously there was a relationship between Nicholson and Polanski...if i had knowledge a friend of mine had committed a sex crime against a child while he was a guest in my home when I was out of the country, that would be the end of the friendship and his welcome in my home. Get the $%^& out and don't ever come back. But I don't know if Jack Nicholson has ever publicly spoken about it or what his relationship has been with Polanski since 1977, though Anjelica Huston has been asked about it and downplays it, and I think that's disgraceful.But this is just my opinion, there are likely many aspects i'm not aware of, or have forgotten.
Katie said >>>>As vile as Roman is, he's not the only one to blame in this case. Samantha's mother should NEVER have let her daughter go off alone with an old man like Polanksi. She wanted her daughter to hit the big time paydirt and just went along with all this.What kind of busy movie producer has time to come pick her up at home? This all should have been done in a photographer's studio, and the mother should have gone along each time. I know I would have. <<<<<Completely agree.
Hi Marliese.I feel very sure that Nicholson had no idea that Polanksi was molesting or raping anyone at his home. He probably just assumed that Roman was having a consensual relationship with a grown woman. I think that Nicholson felt some obligation toward Roman, not only because of the success of Chinatown, but also due to his loss at Cielo Drive. And I don't doubt that Roman took advantage of that.I'm not sure where Roman was living at that time, but why didn't he just take the girl there? Why involve someone else in his lewd activities?I don't really remember exactly when Angelica Huston showed up. I read Samantha's story on-line a few years ago, and I just remember that she was there at some point. She could very well have come home after Roman and Samantha were already there for a while and discovered their presence. I agree...Jack Nicholson had no fault in any of this other than relenting to let a short, squatty over-sexed pervert crash his pad whenever he wanted to. A decision I'm sure he regretted.I've never read anything more about Polanski's & Nicholson's relationship after this happened. In fact, I get the feeling that they weren't really "friends", but acquaintances, one of whom took advantage of the other.
Oh, I meant to add:Jack Nicholson may not have even known that Roman was even bringing women or girls there. He might have just assumed that Roman was just hanging out there alone or with friends.It makes me wonder if Roman did this to other girls but they never said anything because of embarrassment. The only reason Samantha's mother found out about it is because she overheard Samantha telling a friend about it on the phone. Samantha just wanted to forget about it because she was embarrassed about it.
oh i don't think samantha was his first or last victim. guys that have an attraction to 13 or 14 year olds gravitate to them. hell even bill nelson could find them.
Beauders, I have a feeling that you're right. Polanski probably used his "position" to lure many young girls into his trap.
"Beauders I can't imagine anybody wanting to be with him either. I guess it has to do with money. He doesn't have any charm or charisma that I can detect in any of the videos I've seen of him. He doesn't even speak good English so it's hard to even understand him." - KatieIn the 60s Roman was a famous and influential director. Didn't Henry Kissinger say that power is the best aphrodisiac? It didn't matter that Roman was not movie-star handsome or couldn't speak English very well. He was a powerful man in the film world and I can understand how beautiful women like Sharon, Michelle, Jill St. John, etc. would be attracted to him.
Hi Carol!>>>Carol said: In the 60s Roman was a famous and influential director. Didn't Henry Kissinger say that power is the best aphrodisiac? It didn't matter that Roman was not movie-star handsome or couldn't speak English very well. He was a powerful man in the film world and I can understand how beautiful women like Sharon, Michelle, Jill St. John, etc. would be attracted to him.>>>I don't think that Roman was generally regarded as a great film director in the US until he scored with Rosemary's Baby in 1968. Until then, he was more of a "foreign director". I personally never heard of him until the murders. Then he became more infamous than famous.Irregardless, I can see your point in women gravitating toward a "powerful" man. It's too bad that he had/has a penchant for baby flesh. In the end, he's just a dirty old pedophile.
Please remember: the myth of Henry Kissinger being a ladies man about town was created so that the Nixon Administration could explain away his long absences while he was in secret negotiations with the North Vietnamese to end the war.
Katie, I think I'm older than you are because I remember reading about Sharon and Roman in movie magazines when they began dating (yes, I'm that old). I thought it was so cool that an all-American girl like Sharon would be involved with a director from another country. This was before Rosemary's Baby. Maybe Roman wasn't as famous as I remember him being, but he was becoming a force in the film world. starship, I remember seeing lots of pictures of Kissinger with many beautiful stars, like the popular Jill St. John. I don't think his dating history was a myth.
Hi Carol.Maybe you are older than I am. Truth be told, I didn't really even know who Sharon Tate was until August 9th or 10th, 1969. I had heard of the movie Valley of the Dolls, but my mother wouldn't let me go see it. LOL.After the murders, they started showing all of Sharon's movies all over the place, mostly at drive-ins. I did go with my friends and see the Fearless Vampire Killers movie, which really sucked, but they were pushing it because Roman and Sharon were in it. So I guess what I'm trying to say is that I wasn't really aware of Sharon or Roman until after the murders.
Hi, Carol,No his dating history is not a myth, but they played it up much bigger than it actually was so when HK was away for long weekends or whatever, when asked about it, they could smile and tee hee and say things like, "Well you know Henry isn't married..."
Post a Comment